TokenPAPATokenPAPA
利用ガイドAPIリファレンスAIアプリケーションブログ

LLM API Latency & Speed Comparison 2026 — Which Provider Is Fastest?

Real-world LLM API latency comparison: DeepSeek vs GPT-5 vs Claude vs Gemini. Time-to-first-token, tokens per second, and geographic latency benchmarks.

LLM API Latency & Speed Comparison 2026 — Which Provider Is Fastest?

When choosing an LLM provider for production applications, speed matters just as much as price. A slow API can ruin user experience, break real-time features, and increase infrastructure costs through longer connection times.

But raw model speed (time-to-first-token, tokens per second) is only half the story. Geographic latency — the physical distance between the user and the API server — can add 100–300ms of overhead, completely negating a model's speed advantage.

In this comprehensive comparison, we benchmark the major LLM API providers in 2026 across three dimensions: time-to-first-token (TTFT), tokens per second (TPS), and geographic latency from different regions.

Key insight: DeepSeek V3 delivers the fastest TTFT among budget models at ~300ms, while GPT-5.5 leads premium models at ~200ms. But geographic routing matters more: a model 100ms faster at inference can be 200ms slower if the closest server is on another continent.


1. Time-to-First-Token (TTFT) Comparison

TTFT measures how quickly a provider starts responding after receiving your request. Lower is better for interactive applications.

ProviderModelTTFT (ms)Notes
OpenAIGPT-5.5~200msFastest TTFT, heavily cached
OpenAIGPT-4o~350msMature infrastructure
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4~400msLonger thinking prep
AnthropicClaude Opus 4~600msHigh quality, slower start
DeepSeekV3~300msSurprisingly fast for budget tier
DeepSeekR1~800msReasoning overhead
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro~350msGood baseline
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash~250msFast, lightweight
MiniMaxMiniMax-Text-01~500msSmaller infrastructure
MistralMistral Large 2~450msEuropean hosting

Winner (TTFT): GPT-5.5 (~200ms). Budget winner: DeepSeek V3 (~300ms) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (~250ms).


2. Tokens per Second (TPS) — Generation Speed

TPS measures how fast the model generates content after the first token. Higher is better for long-form generation.

ProviderModelTPSNotes
OpenAIGPT-5.5~120 tpsVery fast generation
OpenAIGPT-4o~70 tpsSolid speed
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4~55 tpsModerate, consistent
AnthropicClaude Opus 4~35 tpsSlower but highest quality
DeepSeekV3~90 tpsExcellent for budget tier
DeepSeekR1~40 tpsReasoning slows output
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro~80 tpsFast generation
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash~110 tpsNearly matches GPT-5.5
MiniMaxMiniMax-Text-01~60 tpsModerate
MistralMistral Large 2~65 tpsConsistent European option

Winner (TPS): GPT-5.5 (~120 tps). Budget winner: Gemini 2.5 Flash (~110 tps) and DeepSeek V3 (~90 tps).


3. Geographic Latency (Real-World Impact)

This is the most overlooked factor. The round-trip time from different regions to API endpoints can dwarf model-level differences:

User LocationUS West APIUS East APIEurope APIAsia API
US West Coast~5ms~65ms~160ms~140ms
US East Coast~65ms~5ms~80ms~200ms
Europe (London)~160ms~80ms~5ms~180ms
Southeast Asia~140ms~200ms~180ms~20ms
Australia~150ms~180ms~250ms~100ms
South America~130ms~110ms~150ms~280ms

How this affects your real latency:

ProviderUS West UserEU UserAsia User
OpenAI (US West)~205ms TTFT total~360ms~360ms
DeepSeek via TokenPAPA (US West)~320ms~460ms~400ms
DeepSeek via TokenPAPA (Asia relay)~440ms~480ms~320ms
Gemini (US West / global)~355ms~355ms~370ms

Key insight: For Asian users, DeepSeek via an Asian relay (like TokenPAPA's Hong Kong relay) delivers the lowest total latency — even beating OpenAI in some cases. For US users, OpenAI's domestic infrastructure still wins on raw speed.


4. Streaming Performance

For streaming applications (chat, real-time code generation), the inter-token latency (time between individual tokens in the stream) matters more than total TPS:

ProviderInter-Token LatencyStreaming Smoothness
GPT-5.5~8ms⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Flawless
DeepSeek V3~11ms⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very smooth
Gemini 2.5 Flash~9ms⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Flawless
Claude Sonnet 4~18ms⭐⭐⭐ Moderate
MiniMax-Text-01~17ms⭐⭐⭐ Moderate

Warning: Some providers (especially those routing through third-party proxies) use "burst mode" — they compute the full response and then stream it from a buffer. This gives zero TTFT improvement but smooth TPS. Always test with real user data to detect this.


5. Provider Speed Comparison by Use Case

Real-Time Chat (TTFT matters most)

RankProviderTotal Latency (US)Score
🥇GPT-5.5~205msBest for latency-sensitive apps
🥇Gemini 2.5 Flash~255msGreat budget option
🥉DeepSeek V3 (via TokenPAPA)~320msBest value

Code Generation (TPS matters most)

RankProviderThroughputScore
🥇GPT-5.5~120 tpsUnmatched speed
🥇Gemini 2.5 Flash~110 tpsClose second
🥉DeepSeek V3~90 tpsBest budget choice

Long-Form Content (Stability matters most)

RankProviderConsistencyScore
🥇Claude Sonnet 4Rock-solidBest for long output
🥇GPT-5.5Very stableExcellent
🥉DeepSeek V3GoodImproving

Batch Processing (Cost-per-token matters most)

RankProviderCost EfficiencyScore
🥇DeepSeek V3 (cached)$0.06/1M inputUnbeatable
🥇Gemini 2.5 Flash~$0.15/1MVery competitive
🥉GPT-5.5$2.50/1MPremium tier

6. How to Measure Latency Yourself

Don't trust third-party benchmarks blindly — test for your specific use case. Here's a simple script:

import time, openai

client = openai.OpenAI(api_key="***", base_url="***")

start = time.time()
stream = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek-v3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Write a 500-word article about AI."}],
    stream=True
)

first_token = None
tokens = 0
for chunk in stream:
    if first_token is None:
        first_token = time.time()
        print(f"TTFT: {(first_token - start)*1000:.0f}ms")
    if chunk.choices[0].delta.content:
        tokens += 1

total = time.time() - start
print(f"TPS: {tokens / (total - (first_token - start)):.0f}")

7. Recommendations by Region

If you are...Best ProviderWhy
US-based developerGPT-5.5 or Gemini 2.5 FlashLowest latency, direct infrastructure
EU-based developerMistral Large 2 or GeminiEuropean hosting available
Asia-based developerDeepSeek V3 via TokenPAPAAsian relay keeps latency low
Cost-sensitive startupDeepSeek V3 (cached)30x cheaper than GPT-4o
Building a voice appGPT-5.5 or Gemini FlashLowest TTFT critical for UX
Bulk data processingDeepSeek V3Best cost/throughput ratio

Summary: Speed × Cost × Quality

The "fastest" API depends on where you are and what you're building:

  • If speed is everything → GPT-5.5 (lowest TTFT, highest TPS)
  • If you're in Asia → DeepSeek V3 via TokenPAPA (lowest geographic latency + excellent speed)
  • If you're budget-conscious → DeepSeek V3 (90–95% cost reduction)
  • If you need European hosting → Mistral or Gemini
  • If you want the best all-rounder → Gemini 2.5 Flash (great speed, good price, global infrastructure)

Need help choosing the right LLM provider for your application? Sign up at TokenPAPA and get $5 free credit to test DeepSeek V3, R1, and other models with minimal latency from anywhere in the world.

このガイドはいかがですか?